Showing posts with label King Pu-tsung. Show all posts
Showing posts with label King Pu-tsung. Show all posts

2010/08/19

朱立倫是精神錯亂還是把人民當白痴?

中國國民黨新北市長候選人朱立倫在他自己的部落格上發表了一篇新聞稿,質疑他的對手蔡英文對當選後做滿任期的承諾:

民進黨主席蔡英文宣布參選新北市長以來,一直不願意正面回答是否會做滿任期的問題,這是不是一開始就打定主意要落跑?
自從蔡英文 5月23日宣布參選後,朱立倫就立刻提出這個質疑,似乎對蔡英文「是不是做滿整個任期」比「有什麼政見」要在意得多。甚且,即使蔡英文已經在 5月25日的記者會 (video)上承諾「一定負責到底」,朱立倫與他的國民黨還是一直咬住這個議題不放,已經快三個月了還在這個議題上死纏爛打,好像非常害怕蔡英文做不滿任期。

更離譜的是,朱立倫這個膽敢拿「承諾不要落跑」當作競選政見的人,本身卻擁有照亮歷史的輝煌落跑記錄。底下這個表格列出朱立倫的從政簡史以及相對應的民選公職任期。注意看那些紅色標出來的日期:

朱立倫從政落跑記錄
朱立倫從政表立法委員任期桃園縣長任期
1999/2/11999/2/1
第四屆立法委員
開始競選縣長

第四屆立法委員
2001/12/20 落跑!!
2001/12/192001/12/19
第十四屆桃園縣縣長2002/1/31第十四屆縣長
2005/12/192005/12/19
2005/12/202005/12/20
第十五屆桃園縣縣長
2009/9/9 落跑!!第十五屆縣長 
2009/9/10
行政院副院長2009/12/19
2010/5/17
辭職競選新北市長

朱立倫落跑了兩次:一次是 2001/12/20 立委當了一半跑去選桃園縣長。立法院的正式記錄不但寫得很清楚,還特別用紅字標出他「中途離職」(看本文附錄 [1])。他當桃園縣長後,又在 2009/9/9 任期中第二次落跑去當行政院副院長。事實上,他的從政生崖中必須對選民負責的民選公職,就只有立法委員與桃園縣長兩個位置,但他兩個都給它落跑,落跑率百分之百。

為什麼一個有這麼完美落跑紀錄的人,竟然認為他有那個臉來質疑別人「可能」會落跑?

他的文章中又說:

對於蔡英文競選總部副總幹事鄭文燦指稱國民黨新北市長參選人朱立倫曾有三次落跑紀錄,朱立倫上午表示,他是在立委任期屆滿後才參與縣長選舉,兩任縣長八年做到只剩不到九十天的任期才轉任副院長,而副院長根本不是任期制,他實在佩服民進黨硬拗的功力。

啊?原來他竟認為他是在立委任期屆滿後才參與縣長選舉的?

在這個影音新聞中, 朱立倫微笑面對鏡頭,厚顏無恥地說出這樣的話來:

我是立委屆滿去改選的時候,一起選縣長的。

看著鏡頭,臉不紅氣不喘,公然扭曲事實的硬凹功夫,不但令人嘔吐,更令人質疑 ── 難道,他真的相信過去那些可以輕易查證的事實是如他所幻想的一樣發生的嗎?如果這樣,那表示他是活在幻覺裡,他的精神狀態恐怕已經錯亂失常。

他同時又強調當桃園縣長他只不過提早三個月落跑而已。提早三個月落跑不算落跑?把人民當白痴嗎?

朱立倫現在正在競選期間,也就是說,正在「有求於民」的時候。一個政治人物,在這種時刻,對可以輕易查證的事實都可以這樣公然對人民瞎掰,那等到他手中握有權力、不再有求於民的時候,對於民眾很難查證的公權力運用,他有可能誠實面對人民嗎?

新北市將會是台灣第一大都市,新北市人真該好好想想,把手中神聖的一票浪費在這種候選人身上,最後會不會害了自己。

附錄

[1] 立法院The 正式記錄(截圖1,截圖2),明顯標註朱立倫「中途離職」:


[2] 朱立倫自己的網站上的自我介紹 清楚寫明他是在2001年,也就是立法委員任期的前一年,就已經就職桃園縣長。

[3] 朱立倫的硬凹影片: 綠批落跑3次 朱嗆勿胡扯硬拗-民視新聞

[4] 朱立倫質疑蔡英文的新聞稿 (截圖).

2010/08/18

Delusional Eric Chu and KMT's Suicidal Campaign Strategy

 
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)'s New Taipei City mayor candidate, Eric Chu (朱立倫), posted a news release on his own blog, questioning why his counter part, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)'s candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), doesn't promise clearly to finish the full term of mayor if she gets elected,

民進黨主席蔡英文宣布參選新北市長以來,一直不願意正面回答是否會做滿任期的問題,這是不是一開始就打定主意要落跑?
Since she announced to campaign for the New Taipei City mayor, DPP's president Tsai Ing-Wen (蔡英文) never answered directly if she will finish the full term once she gets elected. Isn't she intending to run away in the first place ?

Chu has been hammering at this topic ever since Tsai announced her campaign on May 23rd (2010). In fact, asking Tsai to promise the full term -- but not what Tsai has to offer for the New Taipei City -- seems to be Chu's major concern since day one.

Tsai already responded, on May 25th, in a press conference (video) that she will "be responsible to the end" if she is elected. That doesn't seem to slow down KMT's attack on this issue at all.

But that's not the issue here. Chu, who has the audacity to question other's commitment, is a politician with outstanding records of quitting his public service positions in the middle of the terms. As shown in the table below, the first column is Chu's political service record; the 2nd: the official Legislator term, and the 3rd: the official commissioner term. Note the dates marked with red.

朱立倫從政落跑記錄
Eric Chu's Runaway Record

First column: Chu's political service record; 2nd: Official Legislator term;
3rd: Office commissioner term. TCC: Taoyuan County Commissioner
朱立倫從政表
Chu's history
立法委員任期
Legislator term
桃園縣長任期
TCC Term
1999/2/11999/2/1
第四屆立法委員
The 4th Legislator
開始參選競選縣長
Start campaigning for TCC

第四屆立法委員
2001/12/20 Quit!4th Legislator
2001/12/192001/12/19
第十四屆桃園縣縣長
14th TCC
2002/1/31第十四屆縣長
14th TCC
2005/12/192005/12/19
2005/12/202005/12/20
第十五屆桃園縣縣長
15th TCC
2009/9/9 Quit!第十五屆縣長 
2009/9/1015th TCC
行政院副院長
Vice Premier
2009/12/19
2010/5/17
辭職競選新北市長
Resign to campaign
for New Taipei City

Chu broke away from his commitments twice -- the first on 2001/12/20 when he quit the legislator (see the official record cited in [1] in the end of article) to take up the post of Taoyuan County commissioner (TCC), and the 2nd on 2009/9/9 when he quit his TCC post to be sworn in to the vice premier position. In his political career, he served only two public-elected positions (legislator and TCC), yet he dumped them both.

Why does a person of such a record think that he is in a position to question others' commitment ?

The news release I cited in the beginning might shed some light. Chu wrote:

對於蔡英文競選總部副總幹事鄭文燦指稱國民黨新北市長參選人朱立倫曾有三次落跑紀錄,朱立倫上午表示,他是在立委任期屆滿後才參與縣長選舉,兩任縣長八年做到只剩不到九十天的任期才轉任副院長,而副院長根本不是任期制,他實在佩服民進黨硬拗的功力。

In response to Tsai's deputy campaign chief Cheng Wen-tsang's (鄭文燦) claim that the KMT's New Taipei City mayoral candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) has a history of leaving his public service posts three times before finishing his term (when he previously held the positions of KMT legislator, Taoyuan County commissioner (TCC) and the vice premier), Eric Chu said in the morning that he finished his legislator term before he started campaigning for the Taoyuan County commissioner , and when he left the commissioner for the position of vice premier, their was only 90 days left in his 8-year term of Taoyuan County commissioner. As for leaving the vice premier for the current campaign, he said there's no "term" for vice premier position. He said that he is indeed impressed by DPP's fact-twisting ability.

He argued, and wrote clearly in black and white, that he finished his legislator term before he started campaigning for the Taoyuan County commissioner !! In a video, he smiled at the camera and delivered that outright lie without a blink of eye:

我是立委屆滿去改選的時候,一起選縣長的。
I campaigned TCC after I finished my legislator term, at the same time as the re-election of legislators.

The as-a-matter-of-factly attitude of fact-twisting is truly mind-boggling. Did he really believe that's what happened ?

He also argued that "leaving the post only 3 months earlier before the end of the term" doesn't count as leaving the post earlier. With that kind of twisting, he went on to attack DPP being fact-twisting.

Now we know at least one thing --- he is probably in such a delusional state of total denial to the fact that he did run away from his duty twice. When a person is so far out of the touch of reality, his mental health is in serious doubt.

KMT's Suicidal Campaign Strategy

But this might not be as simple as a single politician going delusional. The KMT campaign is handled by KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), Ma Ying-jeou's most trusted spin doctor and the master mind behind all KMT's campaign strategy. Chu's move has to be approved by King. In fact, Chu's delusional statement echoes King's, which was made on the same day.

It triggers some pondering on KMT's campaign approach: Chu has a complete record of breaking away, yet Tsai has none. So Chu is like "using own weakness to attack others' strength." Isn't that suicidal? The more Chu chases this subject, the more people will be reminded of Chu's own record of dumping his commitments, not to mention that this attack is delivered in a manner of Chu going delusional. Chu's credibility will be further crashed, and his mental health will be questioned. Both would seriously jeopardize his chance of winning the New Taipei City election.

Why on earth would the KMT adopt this stupid and apparently suicidal strategy to trash her own candidate ?

It is even more suspicious if we take into account that Chu is considered Ma Ying-jeou's successor in the KMT. Not only is it the consensus of public opinion, but also Ma's move of making him the vice premier is considered a pre-arrangement for KMT's future. Sacrificing KMT's next generation leader is like eradicating KMT's own lineage.

Previously I pointed out that the KMT plans to use admitting incompetence on all fronts as their campaign strategy. In which I asked why the KMT would adopt a self-trashing approach for the year-end campaign. Chu's move described here pushes the KMT one step further along the suicidal path.

But, why ? Do Ma and King have a priority other than winning the Battle-Of-Five-Cities - the year-end election that is considered the most critical for Ma if he wants to win the 2012 presidential election, such that they don't mind sacking KMT's own lineage ?

References

[1] The official record of Legislation Yuan on Chu's profile . Chu's mid-term runaway is highlighted in red on the official site. Magnified here:


[2] Chu's profile on his own website, on which clearly written that he switched from legislator to TCC on 2001.

[3] Chu's lying video: 綠批落跑3次 朱嗆勿胡扯硬拗-民視新聞 in which Chu delivered fact-twisting statements shamelessly.

[4] Chu wrote in black and white his shameless fact-twisting on his own blog.

[5] Chu's wiki (in Chinese). Note that in Chu's English wiki page, his legislator term is not listed.

2010/06/26

KMT's 5-City Campaign Strategy: Admit Incompetence on All Fronts


In the year-end election of Five Cities (五都選舉), the common perception was that the KMT will take the 3 on the north (Taipei, New Taipei City, and Taichung), and DPP will secure the 2 to the south (Tainan and Kaohsiung). KMT's original estimation was 3 easy victories, with the possibility of winning 4 or even 5.

The recent development, however, displays a dramatic twist of trend, indicating that the possibility of "KMT losing all 5" might not be too far fetched.

The signs are showing up on a daily or even hourly basis (see how exciting Taiwan's politics is). Public opinion polls from various sources -- including those from KMT's own, and that from blue media -- say DPP reaches a tie or even winning significantly in New Taipei City and Taipei, and is catching up quickly in Taichung. In Taiwan's politics, a tie in polls so early would mean that KMT will lose by ~20% in the real elections.

The alarming sign forced KMT to call for an emergency meeting on June, 19 (北北都選情拉警報 馬今密商).

At the mean time, KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), who was considered Ma Ying-jiou's last life-saving card and was hired to manage KMT's election campaigns in December, 2009, losing every single election since then, starts to spread news that he is not the one in charge (金溥聰自認非操盤手 只是總協調), paving the way for "it's not my fault" for the elections 5 months from now.

On the other side of aisle, DPP's candidate for Taipei Mayor, Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) is said to already leading KMT's candidate, the incumbent Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍彬), by an undisclosed large margin in KMT's internal poll. DPP's chairperson and candidate for New Taipei City, Tsai Ing-Wen (蔡英文) is on an unstoppable speed train to a wider and wider popularity. People are saying that DPP's "Tsai Era" has come (蘋論:民進黨蔡英文時代來臨) or Taiwan's "Tsai Era" is here (台灣的蔡英文時代來臨). She is ranked #1 in the popularity in Taiwan's facebook in the category of political figure (蔡英文臉書facebook政治人氣榜奪冠 ). Some say that they would move to New Taipei City such that they can play a role in this era by casting a vote to Tsai (小英效應). Positive comments are coming from both green and blue camps, including some blue media that used to avoid positive news of green camp.

In contrary, her counter part, KMT's chairperson Ma Ying-jeou, whose degree of extraordinary incompetence is still deeply impressed in the mind of Taiwanese (in spite that he is still the favorite of many international media), is very very quiet from all these heating developments. Not very much spotlight is focusing on him, as though that he has disappeared. In previous local elections, Ma was seen as a plague of election (票房毒藥) many KMT candidates chose to avoid.

Now, among all these down turns, KMT hired Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康) as the campaign adviser on June, 22 (BCC boss to serve as KMT adviser for year-end polls).

Jaw is one of the cofounders of New Party - a party that is categorized as "red" in Taiwan's "green-middle-blue-red" political spectrum. That is, it is even more pro-China than KMT in the blue camp is.

In a fast evolving political environment, people quickly learn that a common ground in the middle that fits most of the people is the best way to go. Forces on the extreme sides of the political spectrum would quickly fade out from the political battle field.

It was the fate of New Party, and that of Jaw's, too, who retired from the political arena after he lost to Chen Shui-bian in Taipei Mayor election in 1994.

Therefore, the re-appearing of a New Party heavyweight like Jaw to advise KMT on campaign indicates a desperate need of KMT to secure its own - and often extreme - supporters. It is a sign that KMT is losing blood in an unimaginable scale on all fronts, to an extent that they can hardly secure their own traditional base, let alone to spare attention on the middle ground.

The extent of KMT's desperation might be even much deeper if we take into account Jaw's past relationship with KMT. In the 1994 election mentioned above, Jaw insisted in competing with KMT's then incumbent Mayor Thomas Huang (黃大洲) and DPP's Chen Shui-bian even he was warned that he could split blue voters. Shortly prior to the election, that possibility suddenly came into his mind, so he asked his supporters to vote for Huang instead. But it was too late. Chen won (Chen 44%, Jaw 30%, Huang 26%, from here), in an election that marked the first in Taiwan's history in which the split of blue camp directly contributes to blue's loss.

That is, Jaw's act practically sabotaged the election and caused the KMT to lose. At least that's what people have in mind, and possibly that's why he had to retire.

Now, KMT is asking a guy who sabotaged their victory before to run the election for them. This shows how desperate KMT is.

With their history, the outcome of this desperate move might be in serious doubt. Jaw announced that he would "use his experience running in Taipei mayoral and councilor elections" to plan KMT's campaign. Again ?

Lets see ... on 6/24, two days after his appointment, he announced his campaign plan for the KMT (趙少康:蘇郝民調打平 郝就是輸). He started with a statement that according to the current opinion polls, KMT already lost in New Taipei City and Taipei.

He then pulled out his 3-step rescue plan for KMT's Taipei candidate Hau Lung-bin:

1. Tear down the bicycle path on Dunhua North Road and the bus path on Zhongxiao East East Road (拆除敦北自行車道、忠孝東路公車專用道).

The bus path on Zhongxiao East Road is one of the things Ma Ying-jeou bragged about for his "achievement" in his 8-year Taipei Mayorship prior to Hau. The path is badly and carelessly designed like most, if not all, of Ma's major management plans are, and has turned into something that brought inconvenience to and complaints from citizens.

So the first thing Jaw suggests Hau to do is to tear down Ma's "achievement", in a way showing how incompetent Ma is, hoping to reflect that Hau's current bad performance is not entirely his fault.

The indication in his statement might not be far from the fact. In an earlier interview, DPP's Taipei city councilor Hsu Chia-ching (徐佳青) revealed that Hau's team in Taipei city was very angry about Ma. She described that Hau and his team couldn't do any thing forward because they have to spend full time cleaning up all those messes Ma created and left.

But for a KMT-hired strategist to put "trashing Ma" as the first step of campaign plan ?

2. Hau should admit that he didn't do well in the past 3 years so he can beg people for the second chance (承認過去三年做得不好,要選民再給一次機會).

Urrhh ... just how on earth is that gonna sell ?

3. "Effect of chicks-boost-hen" -- asking for the endorsement from the city councilor candidates in order to boost Hau's popularity (尋求議員候選人支持,以達到「小雞帶母雞」的效果)。

In Taiwan, when we apply the term "hen-boosts-chicks" (母雞帶小雞) to the politics, it means that a candidate of higher level elections (the hen, like city mayors, etc) is so popular that he/she can boost the popularity of lower level candidates (the chicks, like city councilors). In that case, lower candidates would fight for the spotlight of having a photo with "the hen".

On the other hand, higher level candidates who are so unpopular will be considered "plague of election", or "toxin of voting" (like Ma ying-jeou is now if he chooses to be a candidate) so the lower level candidates will avoid him/her at all cost.

What Jaw suggests now is to reverse the process to "chicks-boost-hen", asking lower level candidates to endorse an unpopular high level candidate whom they would otherwise avoid.

The meaning is clear: Hau is so disliked by the people, not only can't he play the "hen" role but also he has to rely on lower level candidates to risk their own elections to win.

Again, just how on earth is that gonna work ?

So, a summary of Jaw's plan:

1. Emphasize how incompetent Ma is in order to argue Hau is not that guilty;

2. Emphasize how incompetent Hau is in order to bag for the 2nd chance;

3. Admit how unpopular Hau is so he needs to ask KMT's lower level candidates to sacrifice in order to save his own ass.

Interestingly, this strategy of "incompetence admissions" is announced to the public, not delivered in an internal meeting.

Note:
Similar observations came up today. Both articles (in Chinese) cover much broader range of "phenomena" than mine :

五都選舉:國民黨大勢已去
(Five City Election: KMT's momentum is gone)

五都選戰--金馬指揮部亮紅燈 國民黨可能兵敗五都
(Five City Election: Red Alarm in King-Ma Commanding Center, KMT Could Lose All Five)